Vol. 36 (2026): Volumen 36
Artículos de revisión

Economía Circular y su congruencia con el desarrollo sostenible: una revisión sistemática de literatura

PDF
  • Adalberto G Del Ángel Lara,
  • Arturo Briseño García,
  • Ana Luz Zorrilla del Castillo,
  • Joel Alejandro Cumpean-Luna
Adalberto G Del Ángel Lara
Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
Arturo Briseño García
Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
Ana Luz Zorrilla del Castillo
Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
Joel Alejandro Cumpean-Luna
Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2026.4665

Publicado 2026-03-18

Cómo citar

Del Ángel Lara, A. G., Briseño García, A., Zorrilla del Castillo, A. L., & Cumpean-Luna, J. A. (2026). Economía Circular y su congruencia con el desarrollo sostenible: una revisión sistemática de literatura. Acta Universitaria, 36, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2026.4665

Derechos de autor 2026 Adalberto G Del Ángel Lara, Arturo Briseño García, Ana Luz Zorrilla del Castillo, Joel Alejandro Cumpean-Luna

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Resumen

La literatura sobre economía circular (EC) y desarrollo sostenible presenta una cobertura desigual de las tres esferas de la sostenibilidad (social, económica y ambiental), siendo la dimensión social la menos abordada. El objetivo de este artículo fue analizar la congruencia entre las prácticas de EC y el desarrollo sostenible, así como identificar una liga teórica coherente entre dichas prácticas y las tres esferas. Para ello, se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática de literatura, realizando la búsqueda en Web of Science (WOS) e incorporando estudios sobre sustentabilidad, EC y desempeño de carbono. Se aplicó un enfoque sistemático para clasificar y examinar los trabajos encontrados, integrando elementos conceptuales y marcos teóricos. Los resultados muestran una articulación teórica consistente entre EC y sostenibilidad, a la vez que confirman la menor atención a la dimensión social en la literatura. Finalmente, el estudio ofrece una síntesis rigurosa y comprehensiva del estado del arte y destaca vacíos relevantes para futuras investigaciones.

PDF

Citas

  1. Aguiñaga, E., Henriques, I., Scheel, C., & Scheel, A. (2018). Building resilience: a self-sustainable community approach to the triple bottom line. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.094
  2. Aguiñaga, E., & Leal, A. R. (2021). Supply chain management. humanistic management and circular economy: fostering industry innovation and decent work through responsible consumption and production through partnerships. En C. García-de-la-Torre, O. Arandia & M. Vázquez-Maguirre (eds.), Humanistic Management in Latin America (pp. 1–23). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351174-6
  3. Bag, S., & Pretorius, J. H. C. (2022). Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: proposal of a research framework. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4), 864-898. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2020-2120
  4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  5. Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: revitalization or decline?. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805
  6. Carreño-Ortiz, J., Escobar-Sierra, M., & López-Pérez, F. (2025). Theoretical relationship between circular economy and social innovation from a sustainable development perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1549. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05862-0
  7. Carroll, A. B. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: perspectives on the CSR construct’s development and future. Business and Society, 60(6), 1258–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211001765
  8. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2019). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/40155-la-agenda-2030-objetivos-desarrollo-sostenible-oportunidad-america-latina-caribe
  9. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
  10. Curado, C., & Bontis, N. (2006). The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLIC.2006.011747
  11. Dieleman, H., & Martínez-Rodríguez, M. C. (2019). Potentials and challenges for a circular economy in Mexico. En M. L. Franco-García, J. C. Carpio-Aguilar & H. Bressers (eds.), Towards zero waste (pp. 9-24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92931-6_2
  12. Dissanayake, K., & Pal, R. (2023). Sustainability dichotomies of used clothes supply chains: a critical review of key concerns and strategic resources. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(7), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-10-2022-0410
  13. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
  14. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  15. Ferreira, N. C. M. Q. F., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2024). Quo Vadis sustainable entrepreneurship? a systematic literature review of related drivers and inhibitors in SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 9644–9660. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3305475
  16. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
  17. Gao, M., Ma, K., He, R., Vezzoli, C., & Li, N. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of sustainable product design methods from 1999 to 2022: trends, progress, and disparities between China and the Rest of the World. Sustainability, 15(16), 12440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612440
  18. Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: evidence and some applications. Omega (United Kingdom), 66, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015
  19. Georgescu, L. P., Fortea, C., Antohi, V. M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Zlati, M. L., & Barbuta-Misu, N. (2025). Economic, technological and environmental drivers of the circular economy in the European Union: a panel data analysis. Environmental Sciences Europe, 37, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01119-4
  20. Ghitti, M., Gianfrate, G., & Palma, L. (2024). The agency of greenwashing. Journal of Management and Governance, 28(3), 905–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09683-8
  21. Grimaldi, F., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., & Mariani, M. (2020). Sustainability engagement and earnings management: the Italian context. Sustainability, 12(12), 4881. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124881
  22. Hannouf, M., Assefa, G., & Gates, I. (2021). Carbon intensity threshold for Canadian oil sands industry using planetary boundaries: Is a sustainable carbon-negative industry possible?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, 111529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111529
  23. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
  24. Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66-76. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA19129096&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00178012&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E8047e266&aty=open-web-entry
  25. Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap: driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 51-56. https://www.proquest.com/openview/570cffa134a9b95928a8de2ce3fdd77e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=26142
  26. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: a natural-resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
  27. Hernandez, R. J., Miranda, C., & Goñi, J. (2020). Empowering sustainable consumption by giving back to consumers the “right to repair.” Sustainability, 12(3), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030850
  28. Iofrida, N., Spada, E., Gulisano, G., De Luca, A. I., & Falcone, G. (2024). The social impacts of circular economy: disclosing epistemological stances and methodological practices, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, e5438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05438-z
  29. Kemp, L., Xu, C., Depledge, J., Ebi, K. L., Gibbins, G., Kohler, T. A., Rockstrom, J., Scheffer, M., Schellnhuber, H. J., Steffen, W., & Lenton, T. M. (2022). Climate endgame: exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(34), e2108146119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119
  30. Khan, I. S., Ahmad, M. O., & Majava, J. (2021). Industry 4.0 and sustainable development: a systematic mapping of triple bottom line, Circular Economy and Sustainable Business Models perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126655
  31. Kumari, A., & Singh, M. P. (2023). A journey of social sustainability in organization during MDG & SDG period: a bibliometric analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 88, 101668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101668
  32. Lin, Z., Liao, X., & Yang, Y. (2023). China’s experience in developing green finance to reduce carbon emissions: from spatial econometric model evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 15531-15547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23246-8
  33. Lopes, A. B., Chiappetta, C. J., Sarkis, J., Latan, H., Roubaud, D., Godinho, M., & Queiroz, M. (2021). Fostering low-carbon production and logistics systems: framework and empirical evidence. International Journal of Production Research, 59(23), 7106-7125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1834639
  34. Loyola-Gonzales, R. (2022). Economía circular: ¿un nuevo paradigma en la economía?. Ambiente, Comportamiento y Sociedad, 4(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.51343/racs.v4i2.854
  35. Macak, T., Hron, J., & Stusek, J. (2020). A causal model of the sustainable use of resources: a case study on a woodworking process. Sustainability, 12(21), 9057. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219057
  36. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659
  37. Mayes-Ramírez, M. M., Gálvez-Sánchez, F. J., Ramos-Ridao, Á. F., & Molina-Moreno, V. (2023). Urban waste: visualizing the academic literature through bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Sustainability, 15(3), 1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031846
  38. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
  39. Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553
  40. Munoz-Melendez, G., Delgado-Ramos, G. C., & Diaz-Chavez, R. (2021). Circular economy in Mexico. En S. Kumar & S. Kumar (eds.), Circular Economy: Recent Trends in Global Perspective (pp. 497-523). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0913-8_16
  41. Murthy, V., & Ramakrishna, S. (2022). A review on global e-waste management: urban mining towards a sustainable future and circular economy. Sustainability, 14(2), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020647
  42. Opoku, E. E. O., & Boachie, M. K. (2020). The environmental impact of industrialization and foreign direct investment. Energy Policy, 137, 111178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111178
  43. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  44. Pascual, L. S., Segarra-Medina, C., Gómez-Cadenas, A., López-Climent, M. F., Vives-Peris, V., & Zandalinas, S. I. (2022). Climate change-associated multifactorial stress combination: a present challenge for our ecosystems. Journal of Plant Physiology, 276, 153764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153764
  45. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
  46. Reyna-Castillo, M. A. (2018). Una revisión bibliométrica de la sustentabilidad social corporativa. Management Review, 3(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.18583/umr.v3i2.118
  47. Reyna-Castillo, M., Vera, P. S., Farah-Simón, L., & Simón, N. (2023). Social sustainability orientation and supply chain performance in Mexico, Colombia and Chile: a social-resource-based view (SRBV). Sustainability, 15(4), 3751. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043751
  48. Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. (2022). The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: evidence from Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, 108495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495
  49. Sánchez-Salazar, E. (2023). Impuestos verdes: una oportunidad para fortalecer la recaudación subnacional. CIEP. https://ciep.mx/AQPI
  50. Scarpellini, S. (2022). Social impacts of a circular business model: an approach from a sustainability accounting and reporting perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 646–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2226
  51. Schmidt, C. V. H., Kindermann, B., Behlau, C. F., & Flatten, T. C. (2021). Understanding the effect of market orientation on circular economy practices: the mediating role of closed-loop orientation in German SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4171-4187. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2863
  52. Senado de la República. (2021). Ley General de Economía Circular. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGEC.pdf
  53. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  54. Stewart, R., & Niero, M. (2018). Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: a review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1005-1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2048
  55. Tate, W. L., & Bals, L. (2018). Achieving shared triple bottom line (TBL) value creation: toward a social resource-based view (SRBV) of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 803–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3344-y
  56. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1998). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  57. Vargas-Merino, J. A., Rios-Lama, C. A., & Panez-Bendezú, M. H. (2022). Circular Economy: approaches and perspectives of a variable with a growing trend in the scientific world—A systematic review of the last 5 years. Sustainability, 14(22), 14682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214682
  58. Varriale, V., Cammarano, A., Michelino, F., & Caputo, M. (2023). Industry 5.0 and triple bottom line approach in supply chain management: the state-of-the-art. Sustainability, 15(7), 5712. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075712
  59. Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9
  60. Wasserbaur, R., Sakao, T., & Milios, L. (2022). Interactions of governmental policies and business models for a circular economy: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130329
  61. Wegener, L. (2020). Can the Paris Agreement help climate change litigation and vice versa?. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102519000396
  62. Weiland, S., Hickmann, T., Lederer, M., Marquardt, J., & Schwindenhammer, S. (2021). The 2030 agenda for sustainable development: transformative change through the sustainable development goals?. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.17645/PAG.V9I1.4191
  63. Zavos, S., Lehtokunnas, T., & Pyyhtinen, O. (2024). The (missing) social aspect of the circular economy: a review of social scientific articles. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-024-00083-w
  64. Zhu, J., Fan, C., Shi, H., & Shi, L. (2019). Efforts for a circular economy in China: a comprehensive review of policies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12754

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a