Vol. 36 (2026): Volumen 36
Artículos de investigación

Las tecnologías digitales y su influencia sobre las problemáticas socioambientales: una perspectiva en México

PDF
  • Jorge Carro Suárez,
  • Susana Sarmiento Paredes
Jorge Carro Suárez Universidad Politécnica de Tlaxcala

Biografía
Susana Sarmiento Paredes Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala

Biografía

Publicado 2026-07-08

Derechos de autor 2026 Jorge Carro Suárez, Susana Sarmiento Paredes

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Cómo citar

Carro Suárez, J., & Sarmiento Paredes, S. (2026). Las tecnologías digitales y su influencia sobre las problemáticas socioambientales: una perspectiva en México. Acta Universitaria, 36, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2026.4762

Resumen

La sociedad contemporánea enfrenta problemáticas socioambientales que amenazan su futuro, lo cual, exige buscar nuevas alternativas para enfrentarlas, reducirlas y, en lo posible, erradicarlas. Ante este panorama, las tecnologías digitales surgen como una opción. El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar qué tecnologías digitales influyen significativamente en la atención de las principales problemáticas socioambientales que vive la sociedad mexicana actualmente. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de trabajos publicados sobre las variables de investigación, complementándola con un análisis de contenidos y validando los hallazgos mediante modelos de regresión lineal. Los resultados revelaron que el Big Data, el Internet de las Cosas, la Inteligencia Artificial y los Robots Autónomos representan las tecnologías más determinantes para atender problemáticas socioambientales. Esto sugiere que las tecnologías, a pesar de ser vistas como parte del problema, tienen un mayor potencial de solución para lograr un crecimiento sostenible en beneficio de la sociedad actual y futura.

PDF

Referencias

  1. Al-Rbeawi, S. (2023). A review of modern approaches of digitalization in oil and gas industry. Upstream Oil and Gas Technology, 11(9), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.upstre.2023.100098
  2. Bahrin, M. A. K., Othman, M. F., Azli, N. H. N., & Talib, M. F. (2016). Industry 4.0: a review on industrial automation and robotic. Jornal Teknologi, 78(6), 137-143.
  3. Bakker, K. (2022). Smart Oceans: Artificial intelligence and marine protected area governance. Earth System Governance, 13(8), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2022.100141
  4. Barron-Lugo, J. A., Gonzalez-Compean, J. L., Carretero, J., Lopez-Arevalo, I., & Montella, R. (2021). A novel transversal processing model to build environmental big data services in the cloud. Environmental Modelling & Software, 144(10), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105173
  5. Caro-Borrero, A., Carmona-Jiménez, J., Rivera-Ramírez, K., & Bieber, K. (2021). The effects of urbanization on aquatic ecosystems in peri-urban protected areas of Mexico City: the contradictory discourse of conservation amid expansion of informal settlements. Land Use Policy, 102(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105226
  6. Castagnoli, R., Büchi, G., Coeurderoy, R., & Cugno, M. (2022). Evolution of industry 4.0 and international business: a systematic literature review and a research agenda. European Management, Journal, 40(4), 572-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.002
  7. Castañeda-Miranda, A., & Castaño-Meneses, V. M. (2020). Internet of things for smart farming and frost intelligent control in greenhouses. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 176(9), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105614
  8. Cepeda, P., Ponce, P., Molina, A., & Lugo, E. (2013). Towards sustainability of protected agriculture: automatic control and structural technologies integration of an intelligent greenhouse. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46(7), 366-371. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130522-3-BR-4036.00085
  9. Chavarria-Barrientos, D., Chen, D., Funes, R., Molina, A., & Vernadat, F. (2017). An enterprise operating system for the sensing, smart, and sustainable enterprise. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 13052-13058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2004
  10. Cicioglu, M., & Calhan, A. (2021). Smart agriculture with internet of things in cornfields. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 90(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.106982
  11. Ciftci, M. M., & Lemaire, X. (2023). Deciphering the impacts of ‘green’ energy transition on socio-environmental lithium conflicts: evidence from Argentina and Chile. The Extractive Industries and Society, 16(12), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101373
  12. Comisión Económica para América y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2021). Tecnologías digitales para un nuevo futuro. https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/879779be-c0a0-4e11-8e08-cf80b41a4fd9/content
  13. Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (Conahcyt). (2024). Sistemas socioecológicos y sustentabilidad. Glosario. https://repositorio-socioecologia.conahcyt.mx/jspui/bitstream/1000/119/1/Glosario_Pronace%20Sistemas%20Socioecol%c3%b3gicos.pdf
  14. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., Andreini, D., Abumoghli, I., Barlette, Y., Bunker, D., Kruse, L. C., Constantiou, I., Davison, R. M., De, R., Dubey, R., Fenby-Taylor, H., Gupta, B., He, W., Kodama, M., Mäntymäki, M., & Wade, M. (2022). Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management, 63(4), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456
  15. Esperón-Rodríguez, M., & Barradas, V. L. (2015). Comparing environmental vulnerability in the montane cloud forest of eastern Mexico: a vulnerability index. Ecological Indicators, 52, 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.019
  16. Evangelista, P., & Hallikas, J. (2022). Exploring the influence of ICT on sustainability in supply management: evidence and directions for research. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 4, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100051
  17. Fabritius, A. (2021). Cómo elegir el método de integración de sistemas adecuado para su negocio. https://stratify.cl/es/2021/08/08/como-elegir-el-metodo-de-integracion-de-sistemas-adecuado-para-su-negocio/
  18. Fermín, C. (2014). Los 10 problemas socio-ambientales de Latinoamérica. Ecoportal.net. https://www.ecoportal.net/temas-especiales/desarrollo-sustentable/los-10-problemas-socio-ambientales-de-latinoamerica/
  19. Flores, V., Vigueras, M. O., & Velasco, R. (2014). Solar vehicles design for urban use: case adapted to Cuitláhuac Veracruz. Energy Procedia, 57, 965-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.079
  20. Gamarra, A. R., Lechón, Y., Escribano, G., Lilliestam, J., Lázaro, L., & Caldés, N. (2022). Assessing dependence and governance as value chain risks: natural gas versus concentrated solar power plants in Mexico. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93(3), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106708
  21. GeSI. (2015). #SMARTer2030. ICT Solutions for 21st Century Challenges. Global e-sustainability Initiative. https://smarter2030.gesi.org/downloads/Full_report.pdf
  22. Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill.
  23. Hidalgo, F., Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F., Birkenberg, A., Daum, T., Bosch, C., Hirsch, P., & Birner, R. (2023). Digitalization, sustainability, and coffee. Opportunities and challenges for agricultural development. Agricultural Systems, 208, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103660
  24. Hill, D. T., Collins, M. B., & Vidon, E. S. (2018). The environment and environmental justice: linking the biophysical and the social using watershed boundaries. Applied Geography, 95, 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.007
  25. Hoogesteger, J. (2022). Regulating agricultural groundwater use in arid and semi-arid regions of the Global South: challenges and socio-environmental impacts. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 24(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100341
  26. Hu, Z., Hu, J., Hu, H., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Predictive habitat suitability modeling of deep-sea framework-forming scleractinian corals in the Gulf of Mexico. Science of the Total Environment, 742, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140562
  27. Kondo, Y., Miyata, A., Ikeuchi, U., Nakahara, S., Nakashima, K., Onishi, H., Osawa, T., Ota, K., Sato, K., Ushijima, K., Baptista, B. V., Kumazawa, T., Hayashi, K., Murayama, Y., Okuda, N., & Nakanishi, H. (2019). Interlinking open science and community-based participatory research for socio-environmental issues. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.07.001
  28. Little, J. C., Hester, E. T., Elsawah, S., Filz, G. M., Sandu, A., Carey, C. C., Iwanaga, T., & Jakeman, A. J. (2019). A tiered, system-of-systems modeling framework for resolving complex socio-environmental policy issues. Environmental Modelling & Software, 112, 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.011
  29. Miranda, J., Ponce, P., Molina, A., & Wright, P. (2019). Sensing, smart and sustainable technologies for Agri-Food 4.0. Computers in Industry, 108, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.02.002
  30. Moral, P., García-Martín, A., Escudero-Viñolo, M., Martínez, J. M., Bescós, J., Peñuela, J., Martínez, J. C., & Alvis, G. (2022). Towards automatic waste containers management in cities via computer vision: containers localization and geo-positioning in city maps. Waste Management, 152, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.08.007
  31. Naciones Unidas (NU). (1987). Our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
  32. Naciones Unidas (NU). (2015). Los ODS en acción. https://www.undp.org/es/sustainable-development-goals
  33. Naciones Unidas (NU). (2019). Aplicaciones digitales ayudan a reducir los riesgos ambientales en la acción humanitaria. https://www.unep.org/es/noticias-y-reportajes/reportajes/aplicaciones-digitales-ayudan-reducir-los-riesgos-ambientales-en
  34. Naciones Unidas (NU). (2020). Influencia de las tecnologías digitales. https://www.un.org/es/un75/impact-digital-technologies
  35. Naciones Unidas (NU). (2021). Making pace with nature. A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. https://wedocs.unep.org/items/1f52ec62-1c09-4e41-8b50-3134c6d7f668
  36. Naciones Unidas (NU). (2022). Digital Strategy 2022-2025. https://www.undp.org/publications/digital-strategy-2022-2025
  37. Naciones Unidas (NU). (2023). Causas y efectos del cambio climático. https://www.un.org/es/climatechange/science/causes-effects-climate-change
  38. Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
  39. Özkaynak, B., Muradian, R., Ungar, P., & Morales, D. (2023). What can methods for assessing worldviews and broad values tell us about socio-environmental conflicts?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 64, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101316
  40. Piovani, J. I., & Krawcyk, N. (2017). Los estudios comparativos: algunas notas históricas, epistemológicas y metodológicas. Educao Realidade, 42(3), 821-840. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623667609
  41. Planelles, M. (18 de febrero de 2021). La ONU alerta de una triple crisis: calentamiento, pérdida de la biodiversidad y contaminación. https://elpais.com/clima-y-medio-ambiente/2021-02-18/la-onu-alerta-de-una-triple-crisis-ambiental-en-el-planeta-calentamiento-perdida-de-biodiversidad-y-contaminacion.html?event=go&event_log=go&prod=REGCRARTMX&o=cerradomx
  42. Qiao, Y., Peng, F., Wu, X., & Luan, Y. (2022). Visualization and spatial analysis of socio-environmental externalities of urban underground space use: Part 2 negative externalities. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 121(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104326
  43. Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. (2022). The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: evidence from Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 248(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495
  44. Roldán-Serrato, K. L., Escalante-Estrada, J. A. S., & Rodríguez-González, M. T. (2018). Automatic pest detection on bean and potato crops by applying neural classifiers. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 11(4), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2018.08.003
  45. Rubmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Engel, P., Harnisch, M., & Justus, J. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/engineered_products_project_business_industry_4_future_productivity_growth_manufacturing_industries
  46. Sánchez, M. A., & Soler, F. I. (2022). Data science - time series analysis of oil & gas production in Mexican fields. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.201
  47. Serrano-Arévalo, T. I., López-Flores, F. J., Raya-Tapia, A. Y., Ramírez-Márquez, C., & Ponce-Ortega, J. M. (2023). Optimal expansion for a clean power sector transition in Mexico based on predicted electricity demand using deep learning scheme. Applied Energy, 358, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121597
  48. Sharma, M., Raut, R. D., Sehrawat, R., & Ishizaka, A. (2023). Digitalisation of manufacturing operations: the influential role of organisational, social, environmental, and technological impediments. Expert Systems with Applications, 211, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118501
  49. Singh, S. K., & Taylor, R. W. (2019). Assessing the role of risk perception in ensuring sustainable arsenic mitigation. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 9(10), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100241
  50. Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023). Internet of things for smart factories in industry 4.0, a review. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.006
  51. Sossa, J. H. (2020). El papel de la inteligencia artificial en la industria 4.0. IIBI-UNAM. https://ru.iibi.unam.mx/jspui/bitstream/IIBI_UNAM/89/1/01_inteligencia_artificial_juan_sossa.pdf
  52. Tabelin, C. B., Park, I., Phengsaart, T., Jeon, S., Villacorte-Tabelin, M., Alonzo, D., Yoo, K., Ito, M., & Hiroyoshi, N. (2021). Copper and critical metals production from porphyry ores and E-wastes: a review of resource availability, processing/recycling challenges, socio-environmental aspects, and sustainability issues. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105610
  53. Tanveer, U., Kremantzis, M. D., Roussinos, N., Ishaq, S., Kyrgiakos, L. S., & Vlontzos, G. (2023). A fuzzy TOPSIS model for selecting digital technologies in circular supply chains. Supply Chain Analytics, 4, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2023.100038
  54. Tetreault, D. (2020). The new extractivism in Mexico: rent redistribution and resistance to mining and petroleum activities. World Development, 126, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104714
  55. Torres-Malca, J. R., Vera-Ponce, V. J., Zuzunaga-Montoya, F. E., Talavera, J. E., & De la Cruz-Vargas, J. A. (2022). Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas sobre el consumo de sal en la población peruana. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana, 22(2), 273-279. https://doi.org/10.25176/RFMH.v22i2.4768
  56. Tsai, F. M., Bui, T., Tseng, M., Ali, M. H., Lim, M. K., & Chiu, A. S. F. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management trends in world regions: a data-driven analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 16, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105421
  57. Wang, L., Chen, Y., Ramsey, T. S., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2021). Will researching digital technology really empower green development? Technology in Society, 66, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101638

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a