Vol. 29 (2019)
Artículos de investigación

Modules of elasticity and rupture of laminated wood of three tropical species

PDF (Spanish) XML (Spanish)
  • Javier Ramón Sotomayor Castellanos,
  • Koji Adachi,
  • Iida Ryuichi,
  • Tomoyuki Hayashi
Javier Ramón Sotomayor Castellanos Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo
Koji Adachi
Iida Ryuichi
Tomoyuki Hayashi

Published 2019-09-25

Copyright Notice

How to Cite

Modules of elasticity and rupture of laminated wood of three tropical species. (2019). Acta Universitaria, 29, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2019.2178

Abstract

The correct use of laminated beams requires that their mechanical strength be characterized. The objective of the research was to determine the density, the modulus of elasticity and the modulus of rupture in small sized specimens of solid and laminated wood of Enterolobium cyclocarpum, Tabebuia rosea and Jouglas pyriformis. It is concluded that laminated wood, made with wood of the same species, increases its density. But, for the case of the modulus of elasticity and rupture, they increase or decrease depending on the species and/or depending on whether the wood is solid or laminated. The results of the bending tests suggest that the magnitude of the modulus of elasticity and the modulus of rupture are similar to those reported in the literature for solid and laminated wood, manufactured with vinyl polyacetate adhesives.

PDF (Spanish) XML (Spanish)

References

  1. ASTM International. (2014). ASTM D143-14, Standard Test Methods for Small Clear Specimens of Timber. West Conshohocken, ASTM International. doi: 10.1520/D0143
  2. ASTM International. (2015). ASTM D198-15, Standard Test Methods of Static Tests of Lumber in Structural Sizes. West Conshohocken, ASTM International. doi: 10.1520/D0198-15
  3. Araujo Molina, O., Cerón Cardeña, M., Chan Martín, M., & Azueta García, M. (2005). Resistencia a la flexión de vigas laminadas con tres especies de madera tropical mexicana. Ingeniería, 9(1), 5-12. Recuperado el 1 de diciembre de 2017 de: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=46790101
  4. Bal, C. C., & BektaÅŸ, I. (2012). The effects of wood species, load direction, and adhesives on bending properties of laminated veneer lumber. Bioresurces, 7(3), 3104-3112. Recuperado el 1 de diciembre de: http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_07_3_3104_Bal_Bektas_Wood_Species_Load_Bending_Veneer_Lumber/1572
  5. Bourreau, D., Aimene, Y., Beauchêne, J., & Thibaut, B. (2013). Feasibility of glued laminated timber beams with tropical hardwoods. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 71(5), 653-662. doi: 10.1007/s00107-013-0721-4
  6. Bowyer, J. L., Shmulsky, R., & Haygreen, J. G. (2007). Forest Products and Wood Science. An Introduction. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
  7. Erdil, Y. Z., Kasal, A., Zhang, J., Efe, H., & Dizei, T. (2009). Comparison of mechanical properties of solid wood and laminated veneer lumber fabricated from Turkish beech, Scotch pine, and Lombardy poplar. Forest Products Journal, 59(6), 55-60.
  8. Gaff, M., & Gáborik, J. (2014). Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Elasticity of Beech Solid and Laminated Wood. Bioresources, 9(3), 4288-4296. Recuperado el 1 de diciembre de 2017 de: http://go.galegroup.com.etechconricyt.idm.oclc.org/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=pu&id=GALE|A207462158&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&authCount=1
  9. Gáborik, J., Gaff, M., Ruman, D., Zaborsky, V., Kasickova, V., & Sikora, A. (2016).
  10. Adhesive as a Factor Affecting the Properties of Laminated Wood. Bioresources, 11(4), 10565-10574. doi: 10.15376/biores.11.4.10565-10574
  11. Hayashi, T., & Miyatake, A. (2015). Recent research and development on sugi (Japanese cedar) structural glued laminated timber. Journal of Wood Science, 61(4), 337-342. doi: 10.1007/s10086-015-1475-x
  12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2014a). ISO 13061-2:2014. Wood. Determination of density for physical and mechanical tests. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Recuperado el 1 de diciembre de 2017 de: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=60064
  13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2014b). ISO 13061-1:2014. Wood. Determination of moisture content for physical and mechanical tests. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Recuperado el 1 de diciembre de 2017 de: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=60063
  14. Keskin, H. (2009). Impact of impregnation chemical on the bending strength of solid and laminated wood materials. Materials and Design, 30(3), 796-803. doi:
  15. 1016/j.matdes.2008.05.043
  16. Kohl, D., Long, T. H. N., & Böhm, S. (2017). Wood-based multi-material systems for technical applications compatibility of wood from emerging and developing countries. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 611-618. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.078
  17. Kohl, D., Link, P., & Böhm, S. (2016). Wood as a Technical Material for Structural Vehicle Components. Procedia CIRP, 40, 557-561. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.133
  18. Komariah, R. N., Hadi, Y. S., Massijaya, M. Y., & Suryana, J. (2015). Physical-Mechanical Properties of Glued Laminated Timber Made from Tropical Small-Diameter Logs Grown in Indonesia. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology, 43(2), 156-167. doi: 10.5658/WOOD.2015.43.2.156
  19. Missanjo, E., & Matsumura, J. (2016). Wood Density and Mechanical Properties of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon in Malawi. Forest, 7(7), 135-146. doi:10.3390/f7070135
  20. Nadir, Y., & Nagarajan, P. (2014). The behavior of horizontally glued laminated beams using rubber Wood. Construction and Building Materials, 55, 398-405. doi:
  21. 1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.032
  22. Niklas, K. J., & Spatz, H. C. (2010). Worldwide correlations of mechanical properties and green wood density. American Journal of Botany, 97(10), 1587-1594. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000150
  23. Onoda, Y., Richards, A. E., & Westoby, M. (2010). The Relationship between Stem Biomechanics and Wood Density Is Modified by Rainfall in 32 Australian Woody Plant Species. The New Phytologist, 185(2), 493-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03088.x
  24. Silva Guzmán, J. A., Fuentes Talavera, F. J., Rodríguez Anda R., Torres Andrade, P. A., Lomelí Ramírez, M. A., Ramos Quirarte, J., Waitkus, C., & Richter, H. G. (2010). Fichas de propiedades tecnológicas y usos de maderas nativas se México e importadas. México: Comisión Nacional Forestal.
  25. Sotomayor Castellanos, J. R. (2015). Banco FITECMA de características físico-mecánicas de maderas mexicanas. Morelia: Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Recuperado el 1 diciembre de 2017 de: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Javier_Ramon_Sotomayor_Castellanos2/publication/276841418_Banco_FITECMA_de_caracteristicas_fisico-mecanicas_de_maderas_Mexicanas/links/555a2dc408aeaaff3bfabb2c/Banco-FITECMA-de-caracteristicas-fisico-mecanicas-de-maderas-Mexicanas.pdf
  26. Sotomayor Castellanos, J. R., & Correa Jurado, S. (2016). Retención de sales de boro en la madera y su efecto en el módulo de elasticidad dinámico. Revista Científica. 24(1): 67-76. doi: 10.14483/10.14483/udistrital.jour.RC.2016.24.a9
  27. Tamarit Urias, J. C., & López Torres, J. L. (2007). Xilotecnología de los principales árboles tropicales de México. Libro técnico No. 3. Tlahuapan: INIFAP.
  28. Walker, J. C. F. (2006). Primary Wood Processing. Dordrecht: Springer.