Vol. 25 No. 5 (2015)
Artículos de investigación

Size at maturity of the Cortes geoduck Panopea globosa in Central Gulf of California

Eugenio Alberto Aragon-Noriega Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste

Bio

Published 2015-10-16

Keywords

  • Array,
  • Array,
  • Array,
  • Array,
  • Array

How to Cite

Size at maturity of the Cortes geoduck Panopea globosa in Central Gulf of California. (2015). Acta Universitaria, 25(5), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2015.800

Abstract

This paper describes the size at maturity of the Cortés geoduck Panopea globosa in the central Gulf of California. The objective of this study was to determine the size at which 50% of the population is mature. The justification is that this value is still unknown  not only of this particular species, but in general, for other species of the genus such knowledge is scarce. Another justification for the study is that the minimum legal size in Mexican Cortes geoduck fishery, which is 130 mm in shell length (SL), was determined ignoring key biological aspects of the species in Mexico. Mexican geoducks were collected sub-tidal, 20 m to 25 m depth in Bahía Guaymas-Empalme, Sonora located in the Central Gulf of California in January 2014. A logistic model was used fit with the maximum likelihood criterion to get the size value at 50% maturity, which was 91.906 mm SL and 90.909 mm SL, female and male respectively. The analyses of the residual sum of squares showed both curves were not significantly different (F0.284; p < 0.7547), demonstrating that the 130 mm legal size is larger than necessary if the size at maturity was the constraining requirement.

References

  1. Andersen, A. M. (1971). Spawning, growth, and spatial distribution of the geoduck clam, Panope generosa (Gould), in Hood Canal, Washington (PhD. Thesis), University of Washington: Estados Unidos.


  2. Aragón-Noriega, E. A., Alcántara-Razo, E., Calderón-Aguilera, L. E., & Sánchez-Fourcade, R. (2012). Status of Geoduck clam fisheries in Mexico. Journal of Shellfish Research, 31(3), 733-738.


  3. Aragón-Noriega, E. A., Chávez-Villalba, J., Gribben, P. E., Alcántara-Razo, E., Maeda-Martínez, A. N., Arambula-Pujol, E. M., García-Juárez, A. R., & Maldonado-Amparo, R. (2007). Morphometric relationships, gametogenic development and spawning of the geoduck clam Panopea globosa (Bivalvia: Hiatellidae) in the central Gulf of California. Journal of Shellfish Research, 26(2), 423-431.


  4. Arámbula-Pujol, E. M., García-Juárez, A. R., Alcántara-Razo, E., & Aragón-Noriega, E. A. (2008). Aspectos de biología reproductiva de la almeja de sifón Panopea globosa (Dall 1898) en el Golfo de California. Hidrobiológica,18(2), 89-98.


  5. Brouwer, S. L., & Griffiths, M. H. (2005). Reproductive biology of carpenter seabream (Argyrozona argyrozona) (Pisces: Sparidae) in a marine protected area. Fisheries Bulletin, 103(2), 258-269.


  6. Calderón-Aguilera, L. E., Aragón-Noriega, E. A., Reyes-Bonilla, H., Paniagua-Chávez, C. G., Romo-Curiel, A. E., & Moreno-Rivera, V. M. (2010). Reproduction of the Cortes geoduck Panopea globosa (Bivalvia: Hiatellidae) and its relationship with temperature and ocean productivity. Journal of Shellfish Research, 29(2), 135-141.


  7. Campbell, A., & Ming, M. D. (2003). Maturity and growth of the Pacific geoduck clam, Panopea abrupta, in Southern British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Shellfish Research, 22(1), 85-90.


  8. Cervantes-Hernández, P., Flores-Gómez, A., & Sánchez-Meraz, B. (2005). Mínimos cuadrados versus verosimilitud. Ciencia y Mar, IX(27), 41-45.


  9. Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca (Conapesca) (2015). Normas oficiales de pescados y mariscos. Recuperado el 20 de julio de 2015 de http://www.conapesca.gob.mx


  10. Cortez-Lucero, G. (2013). Ecología, biología y pesquería de almeja de sifón Panopea globosa en la región central del Golfo de California (tesis doctoral). Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste: México.


  11. Gribben, P. E., Helson, J., & Jeffs, A. G. (2004). Reproduction cycle of the New Zealand geoduck, Panopea zelandica, in two North Island populations. The Veliger, 47(1), 53-65.


  12. Gribben, P. E., & Creese, R. G. (2003). Protandry in the New Zealand geoduck, Panopea zelandica (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, 44(2-3), 119-129.


  13. Haddon, M. (2001). Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.


  14. National Marine Fisheries Service (2015). Comercial fisheries statisticsz. Recuperado el 23 de marzo de 2015 de http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov


  15. Oceans and Marine Fisheries Branch (2015). Capture fisheries statistics. Recuperado el 23 de marzo de 2015 de http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/omfd


  16. Rodríguez-Domínguez, G., Castillo-Vargasmachuca, S. G., Pérez-González, R., & Aragón-Noriega, E.A. (2012). The size at maturity of the brown crab Callinectes bellicosus (Decapoda, Portunidae) in the Gulf of California. Crustaceana, 85(12-13), 1513-1523.


  17. Sloan, N. A., & Robinson, S. M. C. (1984). Age and gonad development in the geoduck clam Panopea abrupta (Conrad) from southern British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Shellfish Research, 4(2), 131-137.


  18. Solana-Sansores, L. R., Dicante, I., Luna, L., & Villaseñor-Talavera, R. (2012). Selectividad de redes para capturar curvina golfina (Cynoscion othonopterus) en el Alto Golfo de California, México. Hidrobiológica, 22(2), 132-141.


  19. Venzon, D. J., & Moolgavkar, S. H. (1988). A method for computing profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals. Applied Statistics, 37(1), 87-94.


  20. Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical Analysis (3rd edition). Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall.