Conformation traits are those that help an animal to successfully perform its functions and, theoretically, a good conformation should have a direct relationship with productivity, longevity and disease resistance (American Dairy Goat Association [ADGA], 1993; Canadian Goat Society [CGS], 2000). In Canada, the USA and France, data type classifications of goats are obtained to perform genetic evaluations on males and females, which provide information for producers to improve the animal overall conformation, or a specific part of the body (Manfredi, Piacere, Lahaye & Ducroc, 2001). Type traits are evaluated individually, considering biological or linear scale ranges, from 1 to 9 in France and Canada, and 1 to 50 in the USA (ADGA, 1993) and their heritability values (0.16 to 0.33) show adequate genetic variability, allowing them to have good response to selection (Castañeda-Bustos et al., 2016).

However many of metric traits in animals are not independent, but are correlated positive or negatively, due to pleiotropic action of genes (one gene affect two or more traits); correlations are of interest because selecting a trait will cause simultaneous changes in other characters (Falconer, 1996).

The production potential of goats currently depends on breeders properly combining several traits in the selection of animals, including production and type traits. In any animal species, the exclusive selection of a trait, such as milk production, may adversely affect the conformation traits of the animals; for example, the udder may become pendulous in goats with high yields, which in some cases may result in involuntary culling (Valencia & Montaldo, 2005).

Although conformation traits are of interest, it is internationally recognized that the most important economic traits are milk, fat and protein yield. Therefore, they are included as part of the criteria, or index selection, recommended or developed to combine evaluations for total merit of animals (Clement, Manfredi, Piarece, Boichard & Ducroq, 2000; Wiggans & Hubbard, 2001).

Mexico currently has a population of about 9 millions of goats, the second after Brazil, and in the State of Guanajuato there are around 500 thousand heads, so Guanajuato contributes with around 19% of total goat milk production in Mexico and produce almost the same than all the USA (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación-Sistema de Información Agrícola y Pesquera [SAGARPA-SIAP], 2012). In the State of Guanajuato there is a genetic improvement program for dairy goats, which is conducted on thirteen herds in the central region of the country (Torres-Vázquez, Valencia-Posadas, Castillo-Juárez & Montaldo, 2009). The program aims to increase the levels of milk production, improve milk composition (fat, protein, lactose and total solids), diminish the somatic cell count and improve goat conformation. In November 2004, the first evaluation of conformation was conducted, within the framework of the dairy goat improvement project, but that information has not yet been analyzed. To our knowledge, the available scientific information regarding the relationship between conformation traits and milk yield on goats is limited to only a few studies. Manfredi et al. (2001) estimate genetic correlations between predicted breeding values of conformation traits and milk yield on French goats; Ferreira et al. (2013) evaluated only the relationship among type traits in Brazil, while in a study carried out on Mexican goats, Montaldo & Martinez-Lozano (1993) evaluated the association between some udder traits, daily milk yield and the California Mastitis test. However, in a recent study using information from American Dairy Goat Association, Castañeda-Bustos et al. (2016) estimated the genetic correlations between type traits with the real productive life (RPL) and functional productive life (FPL) at 72 months of age. Information about the relationship between type traits and milk is needed to establish adequate selection programs, for example, to properly balance the selection of these traits. It is also important to know the differences between the average conformation scores for USA and Mexican goats, using the same linear appraisal system, in order to make decisions about the improvement of these traits, considering their different production conditions and genetic structure. The objectives of this study were to determine the phenotypic relationship between conformation traits and milk yield in goats and compare the average scores in conformation obtained on goats from Mexico to those on a sample of goats from the United States of America.

Information about thirteen herds of cattle was used. They belong to the National Association of Breeders of Registered Goats, located mostly in the Municipality of Apaseo el Grande, in the State of Guanajuato (Central Mexico). The area has a temperate dry climate with some rain in the summer (70% of the rainfall is recorded between May and September), a height above mean sea level of 1780 m and an average annual temperature of 19 °C. The coordinates given for the Municipality location are 20° 3’’ N and 100° 48’’ W. The predominant breed is Saanen (approximately 85% of the animals), followed by Toggenburg and Alpina. All the goats herds were in a stall-free feeding system, using mostly dried alfalfa with added commercial concentrates and vitamin and mineral supplements. The husbandry is artificial and milking is done twice a day with automatic equipment. About 70% of the milk produced in the farms is used for cheese production (Valencia, Dobler & Montaldo, 2005).

A total of 1085 lactating goats were classified according to their conformation using the ADGA linear appraisal system (ADGA, 1993). The classification was conducted in November and December 2004 by two official ADGA judges using their own ADGA appraisal system. There were fifteen of the qualified traits: stature, strength, dairyness, rump angle, rump width, rear legs side view, fore udder attachment, rear udder height, rear udder arch, medial suspensory ligament, udder depth, teat placement, teat diameter, rear udder side view and final score. A scale of 50 to 99 points was used for the final score trait, while for all other traits a scale of 1 to 50 points was used. Normality of all conformation traits was assessed using the chi-square goodness of fit test.

Goat scores greater than or equal to 3σ above average were eliminated; the total amount of deleted records was less than 1% of the total. Descriptive statistics of the studied traits were also obtained. First lactation milk yield adjusted for age, month of birth and 305 milking days (MY1) and all the conformation traits were used; information of both MY1 and type traits was recorded for 643 goats.

Prior to the estimation of correlations, a linear statistical model using MY1 (N = 643) as the dependent variable, was used to correct the differences due to the combination of herd-year (as fix effect), with the solutions obtained of the model. After making this correction, Pearson correlations between all traits were estimated. Breed and season effects were not included in the model because both factors were non-significant (p > 0.05). In order to evaluate the possible linear and nonlinear relationships between MY1 with all conformation traits, a forward stepwise, third-degree polynomial regression model was used, where MY1 was considered the response variable, depending on all type traits. The forward stepwise procedure added each of the independent variables to the model, evaluating their level of statistical significance (p < 0.05), the error variance of this model and the contribution of this variable, in order to increase the coefficient of determination (R²). The polynomial model was the following (Stell, Torrie & Dickey, 1997; Weisberg, 1980):

Y   =   b o   +   b 1 A +   b 2 A 2 +     b 3 A 3 +   b 4 B + b 5 B 2 +   b 6 B 3 + … + b n Q +   b p Q 2 +   b r Q 3 +   e ,

where: Y represents the first lactation milk yield corrected to age, month of birth and 305 milking days; b_o is the intercept and equals the value of milk production adjusted when all conformation traits are set to zero; b_i is the partial regression coefficient of the i-th type trait, from 1 to r; exponents 2 and 3 indicate the quadratic or cubic forms, respectively, of the i-th type trait; the absence of exponent corresponds to the linear form; A, B, .., Q = corresponds to each of the fifteen conformation traits.

The criteria used to compare models were the level of significance of each independent variable (those with p < 0.05) and their contribution to the increase in R². In addition, this made it possible to evaluate what type traits best explained the variation of MY1.

Type score information of year 2003 for Saanen breed goats provided by the USA Department of Agriculture to the ADGA was used to establish a comparison to the averages scores for the goats under study, focusing on the type qualification points suggested for the 'ideal' goat from the linear appraisal system used in the USA (ADGA, 1993). All statistical analysis were conducting using the Statistical Analysis System program (SAS, 1995).

The descriptive statistics for conformation traits and the correlations estimated of them with milk yield appear in Table 1.

Table 1

Name of the traita	Average	Standard deviation	Minimum	Maximum	R MY1
Stature	22.4	6.3	3.0	40.0	0.18**
Strength	27.5	3.4	18.0	48.0	0.02NS
Dairyness	33.8	3.1	13.0	45.0	0.09*
Rump angle	28.7	5.2	5.0	46.0	0.03NS
Rump width	27.2	3.9	5.0	40.0	0.09*
Rear legs side view	27.5	3.7	12.0	50.0	-0.07NS
Fore udder attachment	27.2	6.5	7.0	45.0	-0.06NS
Rear udder height	35.2	6.2	10.0	48.0	-0.05NS
Rear udder arch	19.9	4.4	4.0	38.0	0.00NS
Medial suspensory ligament	26.5	5.2	5.0	50.0	0.04NS
Udder depth	31.0	8.2	2.0	48.0	-0.22**
Teat placement	15.2	6.9	2.0	45.0	-0.03NS
Teat diameter	17.5	7.1	2.0	50.0	0.02NS
Rear udder side view	22.4	3.8	2.0	45.0	0.12**
Final score	81.5	5.0	62.0	92.0	- 0.08*
Milk yieldb	1221	228	550	2420	---

^a = the measuring unit of type traits was points on a scale of 1 to 50, except for the final score that was measured on a scale of 50 to 99 points; ^b = milk yield was measured in kilograms; the level of significance appears next to the values of the correlations: * = (p < 0.05); ** = (p < 0.01); NS = not significant.

The averages for conformation traits were 15.2 to 35.2 points for the teat placement (minimum) and rear udder height (maximum) variables, respectively. The average final score was 81.5 points with a standard deviation of 5 points. The minimum and maximum values for most of the evaluated traits were very widely separated, suggesting an important variation in the qualification of these traits between the classified animals. Correlations estimated between MY1 and type traits in general were low (from -0.22 to 0.18). The highest correlations obtained in this study were between MY1 and: udder depth (-0.22), stature (0.18), rear udder side view (0.12), dairyness (0.09), rump width (0.09) and final score (-0.08) (p < 0.05).

The estimated correlation between MY1 and the final score was negative and close to zero (-0.08). In a study conducted on Mexican goats, Montaldo & Martinez-Lozano (1993) evaluated the relationship between some udder traits and the daily milk yield; the diameter of the udder and the teat diameter had positive correlations of 0.81 and 0.45, respectively. In Brazil, a study conducted on dairy goats evaluated the associations between 18 conformation traits, excluding milk production (Ferreira et al., 2013). For dairy cattle, Short & Lawlor (1992) also found a low positive phenotypic relationship between MY1 and the final score, whose value was 0.15, on a Holstein cow population from the USA.

Table 2 shows the results of the polynomial regression analysis for milk yield. The table presents, in ascending order, the conformation traits that best explained the variation showed by milk yield, and all of them were significant (p < 0.05).

Table 2

Trait	Estimator	R2P	R2M	Probability value
Intersection	1818.8	--	--	<0.0001
Udder depth (L)	-5.971	0.048	0.048	<0.0001
Stature (CU)	0.004	0.024	0.072	<0.0001
Rear udder side view (L)	5.339	0.005	0.078	0.045
Strength (CU)	0.008	0.006	0.090	0.031

R2P = partial determination coefficient; R2M = determination coefficient of the model; L = linear form; CU = cubic form.

Udder depth, rear udder side view and strength traits in their linear forms were significant (p < 0.05), as were the cubic effects for stature and strength (p < 0.05); the linear effect of the strength trait had a probability close to the level of significance (p = 0.056). One way to interpret the estimated value of bi (partial regression coefficient) using its definition (Steel et al., 1997), for example, for udder depth, would be to argue that for each additional point in udder depth the milk yield per lactation decreases 5.971 kg, suggesting a negative association between these two traits. Table 2 also shows that the contribution of each type trait in increasing R² was, in general, low and that the R² of the model that explains the final MY1 variation due to the type traits was also low (9%). This may be caused by the presence of other important variation sources that directly influence MY1, such as those associated with the animals' genotype, the flock conditions (food, health, management, facilities, etc.), their age, season and year of birth, calving month and the number of daily milkings, among others (Analla, Jiménez, Muñoz, Serradilla & Falagan, 1996; Castañeda-Bustos et al., 2014; Valencia, Dobler & Arbiza, 2002; Valencia et al., 2005).

Table 3 presents the average of points obtained for Saanen goats from the USA and the average for goats under study, recognizing that the compared populations have different genetic structure and live in different production conditions.

Table 3

Goats from Mexico			Goats from the USA
Name of the traita	Average	Standard deviation	Average	Standard deviation	Values for the “ideal” goatc
Stature	22.4	6.3	32.8	10.7	At least 25 pts.
Strength	27.5	3.4	29.5	4.9	27 - 30
Dairyness	33.8	3.1	33.3	3.6	33 - 38
Rump angle	28.7	5.2	22.9	8.0	30 - 35
Rump width	27.2	3.9	29.0	3.6	30 - 35
Rear legs side view	27.5	3.7	33.4	6.3	25 to 30
Fore udder attachment	27.2	6.5	30.1	5.1	35 to 42
Rear udder height	35.2	6.2	34.9	4.0	40 to 45
Rear udder arch	19.9	4.4	33.3	7.0	32 to 40
Medial suspensory ligament	26.5	5.2	24.9	4.8	28 to 32
Udder depth	31.0	8.2	33.0	6.8	22 to 27
Teat placement	15.2	6.9	26.6	4.8	25 to 30
Teat diameter	17.5	7.1	20.9	6.3	18 to 28
Rear udder side view	22.4	3.8	--	--	22 to 28
Final score	81.5	5.0	86.3	3.3	At least 80 pts.

^a = Goats with at least one calving. ^b = Records adjusted to age. Courtesy of Mrs Sheila Nixon (American Dairy Goat Association). ^c = Reference values for each trait recommended by the American Dairy Goat Association.

In the linear appraisal system used in the USA, the stature of an ideal goat is classified intermediate to high; 30 in goats (measured to the top of the withers) are considered intermediate and assigned 25 points, while at least 34 in goats are considered extremely high and are assigned 45 points or more. According to the averages obtained in both populations and the range of ideal points for stature, American goats can be classified as middle and slightly higher, while Mexicans are small. Furthermore, the final average score for the later was lower than for the former (81.5 vs 86.3), suggesting a better overall animal conformation in the USA, using this appraisal system of goats.

The linear appraisal system used in this study to score Mexican goats, which is also used in the USA, is a guide and should be used with caution since it is almost impossible to define the ideal scores for a dairy goat without neglecting yield traits, especially in populations with different production systems. Although the effect of breed was not included in the statistical model used in this study, (it was of non-significant effect, p > 0.05, as we previously mentioned) results are reliable because the most qualified goats belonged to the Saanen breed (around 85%).

New fields of research in conformation traits in goats should be attended or developed. For example, in Angora goats, Marrube et al. (2007) found the existence of chromosomal regions involved in conformation traits in Angora goats, and it represents the first research work in some specific genome sections in order to identify and characterize the genetic variability involved in these traits.

Type classification allows producers to know the strengths and weaknesses in different areas or regions of the body of the animal, to improve by selection, for example, using semen from sires positively evaluated for production traits and positive evaluations for type traits. This can increase the opportunity of a positive change in the improvement by selection of these traits. The type traits should be considered as secondary in selection programs for dairy goats, because animal owners have the main revenues based on milk, fat and protein yields.

The correlations obtained in this study between type traits and first lactation milk yield were low, in general. The highest correlations were found between milk yield and udder depth, stature, rear udder side view, dairyness, rump width and final score. Nonlinear relationships were more intense between milk yield and stature and strength in their cubic forms. Taking into account the linear appraisal system used in this study, the goats from United States had a higher average final score than goats from Mexico, indicating a better overall animal conformation. The results indicated that goats with better body conformation were not the best to produce milk. However, these relationships are phenotypic thereby including environmental effects that can influence two traits simultaneously.