Vol. 30 (2020)
Artículos de investigación

Effect of sheep manure on yield, nutritional value and antioxidant capacity of green tomato (Physalis ixocarpa)

PDF (Spanish) XML (Spanish)
  • Arturo Aguiñaga-Bravo,
  • Kati Medina-Dzul ,
  • René Garruña-Hernández,
  • Luis Latournerie-Moreno,
  • Esaú Ruíz-Sánchez
Arturo Aguiñaga-Bravo Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Bio
Kati Medina-Dzul
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8754-9076 (unauthenticated) Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Bio
René Garruña-Hernández Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Bio
Luis Latournerie-Moreno Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Esaú Ruíz-Sánchez

Published 2020-03-25

Copyright Notice

How to Cite

Effect of sheep manure on yield, nutritional value and antioxidant capacity of green tomato (Physalis ixocarpa). (2020). Acta Universitaria, 30, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2020.2475

Abstract

The effect of the addition of bocashi or sheep manure, mixed with 50% of synthetic fertilizers was evaluated in green tomato. Physiological variables, biomass production, fruit yield, and mineral foliar content, nutritive value and antioxidant capacity of the fruit were studied. The biomass and the yield of the fruit do not present differences between the treatments, except for the root biomass. The accumulation of N was greater in the foliage of plants with sheep manure + chemical fertilization 50% (SM-ChF 50%), the transpiration rate was higher, and the stomatal conductance was lower. The accumulation of P and K did not vary between treatments. The contents of fat, Ca, K, Fe, and total phenols were higher in fruits with SM-ChF 50%. The addition of organic fertilizer with 50% chemical fertilization equals yields and improves the quality of the green tomato (P. ixocarpa).

PDF (Spanish) XML (Spanish)

References

  1. Arnon, D. (1949). Coper enzymes in isolated Chloroplast Polyphenoloxidasa in Beta Vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24, 1-15.
  2. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists . (2000). Chemists (17th edition). Vol. 1 Kenneth Helrich (ed.). Washington, D.C.
  3. Barone, T., Caruso T, Marra FP, & Sottile F. (2001). Preliminar Observations on Some Sicilian Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Varieties. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 55(1), 4-7.
  4. Bilalis, D., Tabaxi I, Zerbas G, Tsiplakou E, Travlos I, Kakabouki I, & Tsioros S. (2016). Chia (Salvia Hispanica) Fodder Yield and Quality as Affected by Sowing Rates and Organic Fertilization. Comunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1-18. doi:10.1080/00103624.2016.1206921
  5. Cantwell, M., Flores-Minutti J, & Trejo-González A. (1991). Developmental Changes and Posharvest Physiology and Tomatillo Fruits (Physalis ixocarpa Brot.). Scientia Horticulturae, 50, 59-70.
  6. Cerrato, E., Leblanc H, & Kameko C. (2007). Potencial de mineralización de nitrógeno de bocashi, compost y lombricompost producidos en la universidad Earth. Tierra Tropical, 3(2), 183-197.
  7. Claassen, V., & Carey JL. (2004). Regeneration of Nitrogen Fertility in Disturbed Soils Using Compost. Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 12(2), 145-152. doi:10.1080/1065657X.2004.10702173
  8. Cobaleda-Velasco, M., Almaraz-Abarco N, Alanis-Bañuelos RE, Uribe-Soto JN, González-Valdeza LS, Muñoz-Hernández G, . . . Rojas-López M. (2018). Rapid Determination of Phenolics, Flavonoids and Antioxidant Properties of Physalis ixocarpa Brot. ex Hornem and Physalis angulata L. by Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Least Squares. Analytical Letters, 51(4), 523-536. doi:10.1080/00032719.2017.1331238
  9. Cruz-Koizumi, Y., Alayón-Gamboa JA, & Morón-Ríos A. (2017). Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria. Revista de Investigación y Difusión Científica Agropecuaria, 41-53.
  10. Elmann, A., Garra A, Alkalai-Tuvia S, & Fallik E. (2016). Influence of Organic and Mineral-based Conventional Fertilization Practices on Nutrient Levels, anti-proliferative Activities and Quality of Sweet red Peppers. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 63(1), 1-7. doi:10.1080/07929978.2016.1151286
  11. González-Mendoza, D., Ascencio-Martínez D, Hau-Poox A, Méndez-Trujillo V, Grimaldo-Juárez O, Santiaguillo-Hernández JF, . . . Avilés-Marín SM. (2011). Phenolic Compounds and Physicochemical Analysis of Physalis ixocarpa Genotypes. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(17), 3808-3814. doi:10.5897/SRE11.570
  12. Hui, L., Ran W, Amin U, & Mridha . (2001). Effects of Organic Fertilizers and Microbial Inoculant of Leaf Photosynthesis and Fruit Yield and Quality of Tomato Plants. Journal of Crop Production, 3(1), 173-182. doi:10.1300/J144v03n01_15
  13. Kim, D., Chun OK, Kim YJ, Moon HY, & Lee CY. (2003). Quantification of Polyphenolics and their Antioxidant Capacity in Fresh Plums. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 6509-6515. doi:10.1021/jf0343074
  14. Kuskoski, M., Asuero AG, Troncoso AM, Mancini-Filho J, & Fett R. (2005). Aplicación de Diversos Método Químicos Para Determinar Actividad Antioxidante en Pulpa de Frutos. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 25(4), 726-732. doi:10.1590/S0101-2005000400016
  15. Luna-Murillo, R., Reyes-Pérez JJ, Espinoza-Cunuhay KA, una-Murillo MV, Luna-Quintana FV, Celi-Mero MV, . . . González-Rodríguez JC. (2016). Efecto de diferentes abonos orgánicos en la producción de tomate (Solanum Lycopersicum). Biotecnia, XVIII, 33-36.
  16. Mehdizadeh, M., Darbandi EI, Naseri-Rad H, & Tobeh A. (2013). Growth and Yield of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as Influenced by Different Organic Fertilizers. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4(4), 734-738.
  17. Oztrzycka, J., Horbowicz M, Dobrzanski W, Leszek S, & Borkowski J. (1988). Nutritive Value of Tomatillo Fruit (Physalis ixocarpa Brot.). Acta Societatis, 57, 507-521.
  18. Ramos-Agüero, D., & Terry-Alfonso E. (2014). Generalidades de los abonos orgánicos: importancia del bocashi como alternativa nutricional para suelos y plantas. Cultivos Tropicales, 35(4), 52-59.
  19. Riahi, A., Hdider C, Sanaa M, Tarchoun N, Ben M, Kheder I, & Gueza I. (2009). The Influence of Different Organic Fertilizers on Yield and Physico-Chemical Properties of Organically Grown Tomato.
  20. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 33(6), 658-673.
  21. Ronga, D., Lovelli S, Zaccardelli M, Perrone D, Ulrici A, Francia E, . . . Pechioni N. (2015). Physiological Responce of Processing Tomato in Organic and Conventional Mediterranean Cropping System. Scientia Horticulturae, 190, 161-172. doi:10.1016/j.scientia.2015.04.027
  22. Servicio de Información Agro Alimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP). (2016).
  23. Servicio de Información Agro Alimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP). (2017).
  24. Singleton, V., & Rossi JA. (1965). Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture Home, 16, 144-158.
  25. Taiwo, L., Adediran JA, & Sonubi OA. (2007). Yield and Quality of Tomato Grown with Organic and Synthetic Fertilizers. International Journal Vegetable Science, 13(2), 5-19. doi:10.1300/J512v13n02_02
  26. Tu, C., Ristaino JB, & Hu S. (2006). Soil Microbial Biomass and Activity in Inorganic Tomato Farming Systems: effects of Organic Inputs and Straw Mulching, Soil. Biochemical, 38,