Vol. 34 (2024)
Artículos de Investigación

Sensory characterization of Shiraz red wine from Parras, Coahuila, Mexico

Carla Zulema Jauregui-García
Chapingo Autonomus University
Bio
Arturo Hernández-Montes
Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
Anastacio Espejel-García
Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
Bio
Landy Hernández-Rodríguez
Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
Bio
Ariadna Isabel Barrera-Rodríguez
Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
Bio

Published 2024-12-11

How to Cite

Jauregui-García, C. Z., Hernández-Montes, A., Espejel-García, A., Hernández-Rodríguez, L. ., & Barrera-Rodríguez , A. I. . (2024). Sensory characterization of Shiraz red wine from Parras, Coahuila, Mexico. Acta Universitaria, 34, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2024.4182

Abstract

The interest in the sensory characterization of a product has increased due to the possibility of relating certain attributes to a specific geographical area or process. The objective was to describe the sensory characteristics of six Shiraz red wines from the Parras region, Coahuila, Mexico, and to determine their correlation with physicochemical variables of the same wines. A quantitative descriptive analysis was carried out under a divided plot design for each attribute. With the significant descriptors as dependent variables, a partial least squares regression was generated using the physicochemical data as independent variables. The sensory panel generated 24 attributes, of which eight allowed the wines to be significantly differentiated. Partial least squares regression showed a greater correlation of alcoholic strength with alcohol aroma and flavor. The quantitative descriptive analysis allowed us to identify attributes that are part of the typicality of the wine and, at the same time, to differentiate them within the same region.

References

  1. Ares, G. (2015). Methodological challenges in sensory characterization. Current Opinion in Food Science, 3, 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2014.09.001
  2. Behrens, J. H., & Azevedo, M. A. (2000). Perfil sensorial de vinhos brancos varietais brasileiros através de análise descritiva quantitativa. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 20(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612000000100013
  3. Cadot, Y., Caillé, S., Samson, A., Barbeau, G., & Cheynier, V. (2010). Sensory dimension of wine typicality related to a terroir by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis, Just About Right analysis and typicality assessment. Analytica Chimica Acta, 660(1-2), 53–62. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.006
  4. Castro-Palafox, J., Macías-Gallardo, F., & Ozuna, C. (2024). The culture of wine in Mexican gastronomy: historical background, current context, and perspectives for the future. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 35, 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2023.100848
  5. Consejo Mexicano Vitivinícola. (2020). Estadísticas. Consejo Mexicano Vitivinícola. https://uvayvino.org.mx/index.php
  6. Font, I., Gudiño, P., & Sánchez, A. (2009). La industria vinícola mexicana y las políticas agroindustriales: panorama general. Crisis internacional, su impacto en México. Políticas públicas para enfrentarla. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. REDPOL. http://redpol.azc.uam.mx/index.php/articulos-publicados/redpol-2
  7. García-Barrón, S. E. (2012). Efecto de la región de procedencia del agave y las condiciones de fermentación sobre el perfil aromático de mezcal [Tesis de Maestría]. Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, A. C. https://ciatej.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1023/429
  8. Hernández-Montes, A. (2007). Evaluación sensorial de productos agroalimentarios. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.
  9. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2010a). Compendio de información geográfica municipal 2010. Parras, Coahuila de Zaragoza. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/app/mexicocifras/datos_geograficos/05/05024.pdf
  10. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2010b). Compendio de información geográfica municipal 2010. General Cepeda, Coahuila de Zaragoza. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/app/mexicocifras/datos_geograficos/05/05011.pdf
  11. Jackson, R. S. (2020). Chapter 6 - Chemical constituents of grapes and wine. En R. S. Jackson (Author), Food Science and Technology, Wine Science (5th Ed.) (pp. 375-459). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816118-0.00006-4
  12. Kharadze, M., Japaridze, I., Kalandia, A., & Vanidze, M. (2018). Anthocyanins and antioxidant activity of red wines made from endemic grape varieties. Annals of Agrarian Science, 16(2), 181–184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2018.04.006
  13. Kustos, M., Gambetta, J. M., Jeffery, D. W., Heymann, H., Goodman, S., & Bastian, S. E. P. (2020). A matter of place: sensory and chemical characterisation of fine Australian Chardonnay and Shiraz wines of provenance. Food Research International, 130, 108903. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108903
  14. Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H. (2010). Sensory evaluation of food. Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5
  15. Liu, S., Zhang, X., You, L., Guo, Z., & Chang, X. (2018). Changes in anthocyanin profile, color, and antioxidant capacity of hawthorn wine (Crataegus pinnatifida) during storage by pretreatments. LWT, 95, 179–186. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.04.093
  16. Longo, R., Blackman, J. W., Antalick, G., Torley, P. J., Rogiers, S. Y., & Schmidtke, L. M. (2018). Volatile and sensory profiling of Shiraz wine in response to alcohol management: comparison of harvest timing versus technological approaches. Food Research International, 109, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.057
  17. López-Aguilar, R. (2022). Metabolitos responsables de las propiedades sensoriales en mezcal oaxaqueño [Tesis Doctoral]. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. https://repositorio.chapingo.edu.mx/items/30954b54-8061-4808-8397-86345b510474
  18. Lu, H. C., Tian, M. B., Han, X., Shi, N., Li, H. Q., Cheng, C. F., Chen, W., Li, S. D., He, F., Duan, C. Q., & Wang, J. (2023). The key role of vineyard parcel in shaping flavonoid profiles and color characteristics of Cabernet Sauvignon wines combined with the influence of harvest ripeness, vintage and bottle aging. Food Chemistry, 19, 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100772
  19. Machado, N. M., Godoy, T., Barone, B., André, A. P., Biasoto, A. T., & Behrens, J. H. (2019). Sensory profile and check-all-that-apply (CATA) as tools for evaluating and characterizing syrah wines aged with oak chips. Food Research International, 124, 156-164. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.052
  20. Manso-Martínez, C., Sáenz-Navajas, M. P., Hernández, M. M., & Menéndez, C. M. (2020). Sensory profiling and quality assessment of wines derived from Graciano X Tempranillo selections. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 127, 109394. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109394
  21. Martínez-Peniche, R. A., & Miranda-Castilleja, D. E. (2022). Antecedentes, situación actual y perspectivas de la industria y la investigación vitivinícola en la Región Centro de México. En A. Vázquez, N. C. Borrego, A. F. Herrera & E. Sánchez (coords.), La industria vitivinícola mexicana en el siglo XXI: retos económicos, ambientales y sociales (pp. 105-136). Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A. C. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363207078_La_industria_vitivinicola_mexicana_en_el_siglo_XXI_retos_economicos_sociales_y_ambientales
  22. Mayr, C. M., Geue, J. P., Holt, H. E., Pearson, W. P., Jeffery, D. W., & Francis, I. L. (2014). Characterization of the key aroma compounds in Shiraz wine by quantitation, aroma reconstitution, and omission studies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62, 4528–4536. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf405731v
  23. Meilgaard, M. C., Civille, G. V. & Carr, B. T. (2006). Sensory evaluation techniques (4th Ed.). CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16452
  24. Mejía-Sanchez, K. E. (2018). Estudio fisicoquímico y sensorial de vino tinto Cabernet Sauvignon mexicano y argentino [Tesis de Grado]. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. http://ri.uaemex.mx/handle/20.500.11799/95047
  25. Mello, L. S. S., Almeida, E. L., & Melo, L. (2019). Discrimination of sensory attributes by trained assessors and consumers in semi-sweet hard dough biscuits and their drivers of liking and disliking. Food Research International, 122, 599-609. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.031
  26. Mouret, M., Lo Monaco, G., Urdapilleta, I., & Parr, W. V. (2013). Social representations of wine and culture: a comparison between France and New Zealand. Food Quality and Preference, 30(2), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.04.014
  27. Mozqueda-Balderas, R., Delgado-Alvarado, A., Herrera-Cabrera, B. E., & Vargas-Lopez, S. (2018). Evaluación sensorial del mezcal de la localidad de Totomochapa, Tlapa de Comonfort, Guerrero, México. Agroproductividad, 11(10), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v11i10.1249
  28. O’Sullivan, M. G. (2017). Descriptive Methods. En O’Sullivan (Author), A handbook for sensory and consumer-driven new product development (pp. 13–37). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100352-7.00002-6
  29. International Organisation of Vine and Wine. (2020). Database – Statistics. https://www.oiv.int/
  30. Pavez, C., González-Muñoz, B., O’Brien, J. A., Laurie, V. F., Osorio, F., Nuñez, E., Vega, R. E., Bordeu, E., & Brossard, N. (2022). Red wine astringency: correlations between chemical and sensory features. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 154, 112656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112656
  31. Pearson, W., Schmidtke, L., Francis, I. L. & Blackman, J. W. (2020). An investigation of the Pivot© Profile sensory analysis method using wine experts: comparison with descriptive analysis and results from two expert panels. Food Quality and Preference, 83, 103858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103858
  32. Ramirez, J. L., Du, X., & Wallace, R. W. (2020). Investigating sensory properties of seven watermelon varieties and factors impacting refreshing perception using quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Research International, 138, 109681. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109681
  33. Rocha-Arrellano, J. A. (2010). Preferencia y consumo de vino mexicano por jueces consumidores en la ciudad de Saltillo, Coahuila [Tesis Licenciatura]. Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
  34. Sadras, V. O., Petrie, P. R., & Moran, M. A. (2012). Effects of elevated temperature in grapevine. II juice pH, titratable acidity and wine sensory attributes. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 19(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12001
  35. Seisonen, S., Vene, K., & Koppel, K. (2016). The current practice in the application of chemometrics for correlation of sensory and gas chromatographic data. Food Chemistry, 210, 530-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.134
  36. Sherman, E., Greenwood, D. R., Villas-Boâs, S. G., Heymann, H., & Harbertson, J. F. (2017). Impact of grape maturity and ethanol concentration on sensory properties of Washington State Merlot Wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 68, 16076. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2017.16076
  37. Sherman, E., Harbertson, J. F., Greenwood, D. R., Villas-Bôas, S. G., Fiehn, O., & Heymann, H. (2018). Reference samples guide variable selection for correlation of wine sensory and volatile profiling data. Food Chemistry, 267, 344–354. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.073
  38. Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3471205
  39. Siebert, T. E., Stamatopoulos, P., Francis, I. L., & Darriet, P. (2021). Sensory-directed characterisation of distinctive aromas of Sauternes and Viognier wines through semi-preparative liquid chromatography and gas chromatography approaches. Journal of Chromatography, A, 1637, 461803. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461803
  40. Siebert, T. E., Barker, A., Pearson, W., Barter, S. R., de Barros, M. A., Darriet, P., Herderich, M. J., & Francis, I. L. (2018). Volatile compounds related to “Stone Fruit” aroma attributes in Viognier and Chardonnay Wines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 66(11), 2838–2850. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05343
  41. Souza-Gonzaga, L., Capone, D. L., Bastian, S. E. P., Danner, L., & Jeffery, D. W. (2020). Sensory typicity of regional Australian Cabernet Sauvignon wines according to expert evaluations and descriptive analysis. Food Research International, 138, 109760. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109760
  42. Spence, C. (2019). Perceptual learning in the chemical senses: a review. Food Research International, 123, 746–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.06.005
  43. Staub, C., Michel, F., Bucher, T., & Siegrist, M. (2019). How do you perceive this wine? Comparing naturalness perceptions of Swiss and Australian consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 79, 103752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103752
  44. Stone, H., Bleibaum, R. N., & Thomas, H. A. (2021). Descriptive analysis. En H. Stone, R. N. Bleibaum & H. A. Thomas (Authors), Sensory Evaluation Practices (pp. 235–295). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815334-5.00001-x
  45. Tabary, C., Miège, M., Brémaud, D., Carvalho, L., & Vincenzi, F. (2021). A tool to help the panel leader to best monitor a sensory panel performance. Journal of Sensory Studies, 36(1), e12613. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12613
  46. Tenenhaus, M., Pagès, J., Ambroisine, L., & Guinot, C. (2005). PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference, 16(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.013
  47. Tomic, O., Forde, C., Delahunty, C., & Næs, T. (2013). Performance indices in descriptive sensory analysis – A complimentary screening tool for assessor and panel performance. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.06.012
  48. Varela, P., & Ares, G. (2012). Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. a review of novel methods for product characterisation. Food Research International, 48(2), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.037
  49. Vázquez-Elorza, A., Borrego-Pérez, N. C., Herrera-García, A. F., & Sánchez-Osorio, E. (2022). La industria vitivinícola mexicana en el siglo XXI: retos económicos, sociales y ambientales (1ª ed.). Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A. C. https://ciatej.mx/el-ciatej/comunicacion/Noticias/La-industria-vitivinicola-de-Mexico-en-el-siglo-XXI/288
  50. Worch, T., & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2015). Contributions to assess the reproducibility and the agreement of respondents in CATA tasks. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.007
  51. Zhao, P., Gao, J., Qian, M., & Li, H. (2017). Characterization of the key aroma compounds in Chinese Syrah wine by Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry-Mass Spectrometry and aroma reconstitution studies. Molecules, 22(7), 1045. http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22071045
  52. Zhu, L. X., Zhang, M. M., Xiang, X. F., Lan, Y. B., Shi, Y., Duan, C., & Zhang, R. L. (2021). Aromatic characterization of traditional Chinese wine Msalais by partial least-square regression analysis based on sensory quantitative descriptive and odor active values, aroma extract dilution analysis, and aroma recombination and omission tests. Food Chemistry, 361, 129781. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129781