Vol. 33 (2023)
Artículos de Investigación

Satisfacción laboral del profesorado universitario que realiza teletrabajo durante la Covid-19 en México

PDF XML
  • Jessica Ivonne Hinojosa-López,
  • María Inés Salas-Rubio,
  • Griselda Meraz-Acevedo
Jessica Ivonne Hinojosa-López
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
María Inés Salas-Rubio
Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2023.3636

Publicado 2023-02-01

Cómo citar

Hinojosa-López, J. I., Salas-Rubio, M. I., & Meraz-Acevedo, G. (2023). Satisfacción laboral del profesorado universitario que realiza teletrabajo durante la Covid-19 en México. Acta Universitaria, 33, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2023.3636

Resumen

El objetivo es determinar el efecto que las características del teletrabajo tienen sobre la satisfacción laboral de profesores/as al desarrollar clases a distancia durante el confinamiento social a causa de la Covid-19, además de analizar las diferencias que pudieran existir entre hombres y mujeres. Para este fin, se aplicaron 296 encuestas a profesores/as de nivel superior en México y se analizaron mediante una regresión lineal múltiple y la implementación de pruebas no paramétricas. Los resultados indican que los recursos, la autonomía y el balance vida-trabajo son características del teletrabajo realizado por los profesores, además de que estas explican la satisfacción laboral general de quienes desarrollan las clases a distancia. Asimismo, se identificaron diferencias entre hombres y mujeres respecto a la autonomía y balance vida-trabajo, así como en la satisfacción laboral general. Esta investigación contribuye al análisis de las experiencias laborales diferenciadas por género en las organizaciones educativas a partir de sus percepciones durante la pandemia.

PDF XML

Citas

  1. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
  2. Bae, K. B., & Kim, D. (2016). The impact of decoupling of telework on job satisfaction in US Federal Agencies: Does gender matter? American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 356–371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016637183
  3. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144
  4. Beasley, R. E., Lomo‐David, E., & Seubert, V. R. (2001). Telework and gender: Implications for the management of information technology professionals. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(9), 477–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570110410663
  5. Brunelle, E., & Fortin, J.-A. (2021). Distance makes the heart grow fonder: an examination of teleworkers’ and office workers’ job satisfaction through the lens of self-determination theory. SAGE Open, 11(1), 2158244020985516. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020985516
  6. Caillier, J. G. (2013). Satisfaction with work-life benefits and organizational commitment/job involvement: is there a connection? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(4), 340–364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X12443266
  7. Coban, S. (2020). Gender and telework: work and family experiences of teleworking professional, middle-class, married women with children during the Covid-19 pandemic in Turkey. Gender Work and Organization, 29(1), 241-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12684
  8. Currie, J., & Eveline, J. (2011). E-technology and work/life balance for academics with young children. Higher Education, 62(4), 533–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9404-9
  9. Dima, A. M., Tuclea, C. E., Vranceanu, D. M., & Tigu, G. (2019). Sustainable social and individual implications of telework: a new insight into the Romanian labor market. Sustainability, 11(13), 3506. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133506
  10. Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12097
  11. Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: when less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 336–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
  12. Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31(2), 301–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271768
  13. Jackson, L. T. B., & Fransman, E. I. (2018). Flexi work, financial well-being, work-life balance and their effects on subjective experiences of productivity and job satisfaction of females in an institution of higher learning. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), a1487. doi: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1487
  14. Jamal, M. T., Alalyani, W. R., Thoudam, P., Anwar, I., & Bino, E. (2021). Telecommuting during COVID 19: a moderated-mediation approach linking job resources to job satisfaction. Sustainability, 13(20), 11449. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011449
  15. Kurkland, N. B., & Bailey, D. E. (1999). The advantages and challenges of working here, there anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 53–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)80016-9
  16. Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., Oborn, K. L., Verive, J. M., & Heelan, M. P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 578–595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011056941
  17. Nakrosiene, A., Buciuniene, I., & Gostautaite, B. (2019). Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172
  18. Nguyen, M. H. (2021). Factors influencing home-based telework in Hanoi (Vietnam) during and after the COVID-19 era. Transportation, 48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10169-5
  19. Nguyen, M. H., & Armoogum, J. (2021). Perception and preference for home-based telework in the COVID-19 era: a gender-based analysis in Hanoi, Vietnam. Sustainability, 13(6), 3179. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063179
  20. Niebuhr, F., Borle, P., Boerner-Zobel, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2022). Healthy and happy working from home? effects of working from home on employee health and job satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1122. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031122
  21. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  22. Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). (2020a). El teletrabajo durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y después de ella – Guía práctica (1ra Edición). OIT. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/publication/wcms_758007.pdf
  23. Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). (2020b). Working from home: estimating the worldwide potential. OIT.
  24. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/briefingnote/wcms_743447.pdf
  26. Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: La Agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible (Resolución de la Asamblea General A/RES/70/1; p. 40). Organización de las Naciones Unidas.
  27. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/Resolution_A_RES_70_1_SP.pdf
  28. Park, S., & Cho, Y. J. (2020). Does telework status affect the behavior and perception of supervisors? Examining task behavior and perception in the telework context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(7), 1326-1351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1777183
  29. Petcu, M. A., Sobolevschi-David, M. I., Anica-Popa, A., Curea, S. C., Motofei, C., & Popescu, A. M. (2021). Multidimensional assessment of job satisfaction in telework conditions. Case study: Romania in the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(16), 8965. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168965
  30. Santana, M., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis. European Management Journal, 38(6), 846–862. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.010
  31. Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP). (2020). Principales Cifras del Sistema Educativo Nacional 2019-2020. https://www.planeacion.sep.gob.mx/Doc/estadistica_e_indicadores/principales_cifras/principales_cifras_2019_2020_bolsillo.pdf
  32. Sener, I. N., & Reeder, P. R. (2012). An examination of behavioral linkages across ICT choice dimensions: copula modeling of telecommuting and teleshopping choice behavior. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(6), 1459–1478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a44436
  33. Singh, P., Paleti, R., Jenkins, S., & Bhat, C. R. (2013). On modeling telecommuting behavior: option, choice, and frequency. Transportation, 40(2), 373–396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9429-2
  34. Stempien, L. R., & Loeb, R. C. (2002). Differences in job satisfaction between general education and special education teachers—Implications for retention. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 258–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325020230050101
  35. Stiles, J. (2020). Strategic niche management in transition pathways: telework advocacy as groundwork for an incremental transformation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 139–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.001
  36. Sullivan, C., & Lewis, S. (2001). Home-based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents. Gender, Work & Organization, 8(2), 123–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00125
  37. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 213–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.213
  38. Yoshimoto, T., Fujii, T., Oka, H., Kasahara, S., Kawamata, K., & Matsudaira, K. (2021). Pain status and its association with physical activity, psychological stress, and telework among Japanese workers with pain during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5595. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115595
  39. Zhang, S., Moeckel, R., Moreno, A. T., Shuai, B., & Gao, J. (2020). A work-life conflict perspective on telework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 141, 51–68.
  40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.007
  41. Zürcher, A., Galliker, S., Jacobshagen, N., Mathieu, P., Eller, A., & Elfering, A. (2021). Increased working from home in vocational counseling psychologists during COVID-19: associated change in productivity and job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750127